• Home
  • Tag: 上海约妹子本人微信

The Price of Affordability

Sign up for DS News Daily Although enacted just over one year ago, the impact of California Senate Bill 2—commonly referred to as the Building Homes and Jobs Act (SB 2), has not yet been felt by lenders and loan servicers. However, as the revenue from SB 2 comes pouring in at a higher than expected rate, lenders and servicers will start to see more affordable housing construction throughout California, which in turn will mean more loans on affordable housing units to originate and service.The act was designed to address California’s affordable housing dilemma by bringing in an estimated annual revenue of $250 million through an increase in the recording fees for the recording of documents in real estate transactions. The funds would be dedicated to developing affordable, low-income housing in California.It seems that this revenue goal has been achieved, as California’s 2018-2019 budget allotted $5 billion to address the affordable housing and homelessness issues, $255 million of which came from the SB 2 fund. Accordingly, in the near future Californians will likely be provided with new, affordable, low-income housing units for purchase. While this is great news for Californians and local governments (which will obtain additional funding from state and federal government), it is important to understand the potential impact of an influx of low-income housing units will have on lenders and servicers who fund and service loans secured by low-income housing units.California generates new “affordable” or “low income” housing units through either new construction or rehabilitation/reclassification of the existing housing units. These new units are then offered for sale through various housing programs administered by local (city) governments and are eventually sold to qualified individuals at below-market-rate prices. Because of this, these units are subject to various value and/or use restrictions, which are enforceable over a period of time (generally, between 30 and 45 years), are binding on lenders as well as the borrowers, and are senior to any mortgage liens.Generally, these restrictions limit the use of property to a principal residence use only, constrain the borrower’s right to refinance or sell the property, and provide the locality where the property is located with a “right of first refusal” and other rights in the event of the borrower’s default, a catastrophic event, or condemnation of the property. Failure to comply with these restrictions subjects the lenders, servicers, and foreclosure trustees to potential liability from not only the borrower but also the locality, exposing the industry to damages not generally foreseeable in regular residential mortgage transactions.With the volume of loans on low-income projects likely to increase in the near future, lenders and servicers should understand the risks associated with these loans and limit their potential exposure and liability through a thorough investigation process.As part of their due diligence in connection with purchase loan transactions, in addition to obtaining a title report/guarantee, the lender should specifically review and understand the restriction agreement recorded against the property. There have been many instances where the title company excepted from coverage the low-income housing restrictions, leaving the lender and subsequent investors, and servicers subject to the often onerous restrictions without any knowledge of their existence and/or understanding of the consequences of failure to comply with them. The lender should study the restriction agreement in detail to ensure that the loan transaction does not violate its terms. The lender should also ensure that the restriction agreement is included in the collateral file, provided to the loan servicer and the system noted for future use—i.e., at the time of foreclosure.In addition, since the localities that offer affordable housing units for sale ensure that they have certain rights in the event of the borrower’s default, restriction agreements and requests for notice of default (recorded by the city or agency) should be reviewed and studied before the commencement of (and also during) the foreclosure process to ensure that these rights are not violated. While this additional due diligence is recommended in purchase loan transactions, it is even more important in refinance transactions. The restriction agreements placed on low-income housing units often prohibit or significantly constrain refinance loans. Accordingly, it is imperative for the potential lender to study the restriction agreement and ensure that the refinance loan is permitted in the first place, or whether additional steps are required to satisfy the restriction agreement—such as, for instance, obtaining pre-approval of the refinance from the city. Finally, in the event of a lawsuit involving a low-income housing unit, the lender, servicer, and/or trustee should consult attorneys who are experienced in litigating the low-income housing matters to fully understand its potential liability and exposure. Share Save Robert Finlay is one of the three founding partners of Wright, Finlay & Zak. Since 1994, Finlay has focused his legal career on consumer credit, business, and real estate litigation and has extensive experience with trials, mediations, arbitrations, and appeals. Finlay is at the forefront of the mortgage banking industry, handling all aspects of the ever-changing default servicing and mortgage banking litigation arena, including compliance issues for servicers, lenders, investors, title companies, and foreclosure trustees. The Price of Affordability Related Articles The Best Markets For Residential Property Investors 2 days ago Home / Commentary / The Price of Affordability Demand Propels Home Prices Upward 2 days ago Previous: The Impact of Student Loans on Millennial Homebuyers Next: When Homebuyers Give Love to Luxury Neighborhoods Demand Propels Home Prices Upward 2 days ago Tagged with: Affordability California California Senate Bill Servicing Servicers Navigate the Post-Pandemic World 2 days ago The Week Ahead: Nearing the Forbearance Exit 2 days ago Data Provider Black Knight to Acquire Top of Mind 2 days ago Governmental Measures Target Expanded Access to Affordable Housing 2 days ago About Author: Robert Finlay Servicers Navigate the Post-Pandemic World 2 days ago Affordability California California Senate Bill Servicing 2019-02-19 Donna Joseph Governmental Measures Target Expanded Access to Affordable Housing 2 days ago Data Provider Black Knight to Acquire Top of Mind 2 days ago About Author: Luke I. Wozniak in Commentary, Daily Dose, Featured, News, Servicing The Best Markets For Residential Property Investors 2 days ago  Print This Post February 19, 2019 1,412 Views Luke I. Wozniak was admitted to the California Bar in 2006 and has been with Wright, Finlay & Zak since 2011. Prior to joining Wright, Finlay & Zak, Wozniak practiced in the areas of complex business, as well as consumer finance and mortgage banking litigation. Wozniak is admitted to practice in California, as well as Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. Subscribe read more

Guatemalan Minister Attributes Killing of 28 People to Mexican Cartel

first_img In a television interview, Guatemalan Interior Minister Carlos Menocal attributed to the Mexican ‘Los Zetas’ cartel the killing of at least twenty-eight people on a rural property in the northern department of Petén, and he said that the victims were agricultural workers. “It’s a detestable act that we believe was directed by ‘Los Zetas.’ The victims were day laborers from (the department of) Izabal who were working on the property for a period of three months,” Menocal told the television news program Noti 7. Four investigative teams, as well as a unit of police special forces, were mobilized in the area of the killings in order to investigate the case and try to locate those responsible for the killings, which have provoked a strong reaction in the country, Menocal added. Los Zetas, according to investigators, have begun to expand into other crimes as well, such as kidnapping, extortion from retailers, and stealing fuel. In August, Los Zetas were alleged to be responsible for the massacre at a rural property in San Fernando of seventy-two migrants from El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Ecuador, and Brazil, who had been on their way to the United States. By Dialogo May 17, 2011last_img read more